ISSN: 2158-7051 ==================== INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES ==================== ISSUE NO. 12 ( 2023/1 ) |
RUSSIAN NOTIONS OF POWER AND STATE IN A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE 1462-1725: ASSESSING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PETER’S REIGN, By Ayse Dietrich*,
Published by: Academic Studies Press, written by Endre
Sashalmi, Year of Publishing: 2022. Subject Area:
Russian Politics and government, Peter I. Book Type: Russian History. Total
Number of Pages: 507. ISBN: 9781644694176, hardback, $169.00.
As the author states in
the introduction, the book highlights the “main features of Russian notions of
power in an era when sovereignty, state, and politics, as understood by authors
and statesmen in Western Christendom”, were either non-existent in Russia or
were only beginning to be formulated and articulated there”. In addition, this
work looks at the Westernization process, the emergence of the concept of the
“sovereign state” with a comparison of 17th century Western
countries, the post-1700s significant change in Russian thought on power and the
problem of reception of Western ideas.
The author avoids using
the word “political thought” since the term “politics” and “political” was
unknown in Russia before the early 18th century and therefore he
uses the concept of the “notion of power”.
Besides analyzing the issue of the reception of
Western ideas in Russia, he discusses the nature of change in Russian ideology
under the impact of Western ideas and the different readings of the concepts
and terminologies in Russia and the West.
The author emphasizes that the main purpose of
his book is to show in a comparative manner how these different interpretations
were developing in Russia, the kind of terms that were used to describe the
practical aspects of state-building in the context of early modern Europe, and how
these terms are suited for the interpretation of Russian history.
The book continues by giving a historical
overview of the terms designating Russia. The author discusses the issues of
territoriality, the name and the nature of polity. The author stresses that the
Western historians’ references to the parallel developments in state-building in
Russia as a “composite monarchy” and a “composite state” do not serve as
relevant comparisons for contemporary Muscovy. He addresses the issue of the appearance
of the term Russiia/Rossiia,
the change from Rus’ to Rossiia as the standard official designation
of the state, the emergence of the new name for the polity Rossiiskoe
tsarstvo. The author also examines the notions Rossiia, Rossiiskoe Tsarstvo and Moskovskoe
gosudarstvo denoting the conglomeration of
territories ruled by the tsars in the early 17th century, the specific nature
of the Russian political system, whether it can be viewed as a European continuum
from the perspective of state-building, the nature of the “autocratic
fiscal-military state”, and the use of the neologism Rossiianin
designating a subject of Russia.
Later, the author continues to analyze the
definitions of the modern concept of the state outlined in the works of the
Western scholars that can be applicable for a comparison with Russia, the role
of metaphors and allegorical personifications in the development of the concept
of the state in Western Christendom, meanings of the European perspective, the
birth and meaning of the Russian state narrative, the link of the territorial
integrity of the country to a strong monarchical power as being the cornerstone
of Russian statehood, the consequences of the state narrative, the discovery of
Gosudarstvo in Russian historical writings,
the statist school of Russian historiography, Muscovite perceptions of ruling
power and characteristics and methodological aspects of a comparison with
Western Christendom, the problems of the concepts of tselost’
gosudarstvo, autocracy and samoderzhavie,
Richard Pipes’ patrimonial interpretations of Russia, the concept of
“proprietary dynasticism”, the concepts of rulership, proprietary, office and
divine right and their relation to each other in early modern Europe and
Russia, a comparison of the divine right of Kings and the divine rights of
Tsars, the contribution of Feofan Prokopovich
to Russian thought on power, his theory of law and state, sovereignty, contractualism, and the female allegorical personification
of Russia during the reign of Peter the Great and his successors.
Sashalmi’s book gives a comprehensive
analysis of the Russian notions of power and state, and provides critical
analyses of the terminologies used by Western scholars. It is a valuable
resource for academicians, researchers and students who study the history of
the Russian state structure.
*Ayse Dietrich - Professor, Part-time, at Middle East Technical University, Department of History and Eurasian Studies. Editor and the founder of the International Journal of Russian Studies (IJORS) e-mail: editor@ijors.net, dayse@metu.edu.tr, dietrichayse@yahoo.com
© 2010, IJORS - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES