ISSN: 2158-7051 ==================== INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES ==================== ISSUE NO. 2 ( 2013/2 ) |
THE EFFECTS OF THE SEPTEMBER 11th INCIDENT ON RUSSIA`S POSITION IN THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM (2001-2010)
RAZIEH HAZRATI*, SEYYED MOHAMMAD TABATABAEE**, HAMED MAHMOUDI***
Summary
The
September 11th incident lead to some principle changes in international security
and many see it as even more important than the results of the Cold War. This
incident not only changed the structure of the international system, but made
countries redefine their foreign relations. US relations with its rival in the Cold
War, Russia, entered a new stage. The question studied in this paper is: “What
are the effects of 9/11 on Russia`s position in the international system?” The
hypothesis is that the 9/11 incident led to an increasing role for Russia in
the international system according to the security and political requirements
of the US. In this article, the reasons for cooperation between Russia and the US
being based on offensive realism, US security and political requirements after
9/11, and its effects on the increasing importance of Russia`s position in the international system are carefully studied.
Key words:
9/11 incident, International system, Security, Terrorism, Multilateralism.
Introduction
The killing of three thousands peoples on US territory on
September 11, 2001 was a major event that changed the total international
security condition and the phenomenon of fighting terrorism appeared on both the
security and global stage. Although terrorism had been an issue in
international relations’ history, the 9/11 incident made the US revise its
relations with other great powers like Russia.
In spite of severe competition between these two powers
in the military and strategic fields, which reasons encouraged Russia to
cooperate with the US during its two wars with Afghanistan and Iraq? What were
the US political and security needs after 9/11 that Russia`s cooperation in
these areas led to its increased importance in regional and
international position after the Cold War?
On one hand, Vladimir Putin, as well as Dmitry Medvedev, had
planned a general strategy so that Russia could play a role as a super power in
the international system[1].
On the other hand, neoconservatives in the US leadership system were sure about
the material and spiritual qualities of their country, and their dominant
beliefs on power structures in Russia and China did not view US power to be
threatening or challenging to their vital values, and they sought American
peace. In part I of this article, considering offensive realism, a theoretical
framework is presented. In part II, US political and security requirements as a
result of 9/11, and in part III the effect of 9/11 on Russia`s position in the international
system are analyzed and investigated. Finally, we will conclude that Russia
wants to revive its past magnificence in its belief in multilateralism in the international
system.
Theoretical
framework
The conceptual framework for this article is the
offensive realism theory based on its theoretical analysist, John Mearsheimer. We
shall study the article`s subject based on the suppositions of the theory.
Offensive realism, like defensive realism which emerged
from the presentation of Kenneth N. Waltz`s international policy theory in late
1970, recognizes the anarchy structure and the lack of central power as the
most crucial feature of international system, but in contrary to defensive
realism and its theoreticians, Kenneth N. Waltz and John Mearsheimer, believes
that superpowers do not to retreat from war and expansionism in this condition
and they take action to increase their power and influence whenever possible.
So, in a state of anarchy which causes constant
insecurity, the most remarkable way to obtain security and power is to defeat
other governments that may be threatening. To John Mearsheimer, there are three
reasons in international connected system that caused governments to be afraid
of each other:[2]
1. Lack of a central power that stands above all
governments and supports them against each other.
2. The fact that governments often have enough capability
and capacity for offensive military action.
3. The reality that governments can never be aware of
each other`s intentions.
Cooperation in this situation is extremely difficult if
not impossible. When allies face a common enemy and their survival is threatened,
this cooperation is promoted in a particular condition, based on the same enemy[3].
The cooperation of other powers like Russia to fight terrorism and identifying
terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda after 9/11 is in this category.
On the contrary, defensive realism believes that powers avoid
the high price of competitions like wars, arms race etc. also for the sake of
their common benefit, but in most cases governments ignore the balance of
powers based on defensive realism and do their tasks in nonstrategic ways.
Mearsheimer believes that some governments follow a wrong
foreign policy and it is due to their domestic affairs. These countries pay
their policy`s price, however, following an improper policy encourages other
governments to behave more logically. In Mearsheimer`s idea, that was not true
for the US attack on Iraq and the reinforcement of military bases in Europe
demanded from Neoconservative rulers. This was because neither of these two
subjects were serious threats for the US, and invasion of these territories did
not help foreign policy to solve security problems.[4]
Such behaviors are mostly based on immature ideologies
rather than logic, and for this reason, Mearsheimer is seriously opposed to the
attack on Iraq, as well as spending money and staying in that country.[5] We should consider the US`s performance and competitive policy with the Federal
Republic of Russia.
On one hand, these two countries cooperate with each
other based on offensive realism in order to fight the same enemies and terrorism;
for instance, Russia has helped the US with transferring equipment and weapons
for American and NATO forces through its territory into Afghanistan. This
cooperation has continued even during Barack
Obama`s presidency, and also the US has expressed its sympathy towards
Russia`s fighting against Chechen independence.[6]
US action against terrorists and the Taliban resulted in
Russia’s and many other Central Asian countries’ release from terrorism because
of their being neighbors with the Taliban, and this result enhances their
cooperation. On the other hand, since governments don`t know each other`s
intentions, they are in an offensive mood and a strong competition has been
created between the US and the Federal Republic of Russia on missile defense
shields, the influence of the US on Russia`s private foreign regions and NATO
expansion to east. These issues are very important for Russia, as a
cross-regional power to advance military capacity based on an offensive realism
supposition.
US
political and security need after 9/11 event
9/11 created new political security needs in the international
system. Before that, there was an emphasis on coherent international policy and
removing US domestic weakness in economical fields, people`s demands as an
essential step to make US strong and challenging of democracy in foreign policy
as the US ambiguous branch of foreign policy managed to be done from the first
speech of Bill Clinton in December 1991[7].
After 9/11 we confront a big change of US politicians’ agenda from anxiety
about domestic affairs to foreign affairs and from educational reform to
fighting terrorism.[8]
The most major political and security need of US after 9/11
are defined in following domains:
1. Influence on the Middle East
2. NATO expansion to east
Influences
on the Middle East
9/11, 2001 and consequently the profound
changes in the international system and
US attack on Afghanistan and Iraq made the Middle East position more sensitive
and important. The Middle East has been considered a security problems for the US
because of its political, historical and economical role from the past up to
now and also the presence of some of US allies.
According to
US officials’ opinions, the lack of political and economical development in
these countries, has lead to a situation that increases radicalism and
terrorist movements among political groups in this area and puts US profits in
danger. In order to prevent these movements, the US has tried to have influence
on these countries by applying soft power factors such as democracy, women`s
rights, equality, etc., and to reform their structures to expand its own
long-term values. These factors have been more impressive with recent changes
in the Middle East during Barack Obama`s presidency. But the presence of Iran,
Lebanon`s Hezbollah and Syria, have enabled the US to reach its goals. Russia
wants to play a role, acquire prestige and persists on multi-step diplomacy to
build a relationship with governments in the region.
Russia as a rival in US Cold War, made this
country to start negotiations by insisting on multilateralism in the international
system by strengthening its relationship with Iran, Syria and Palestinian
governments with the leadership of Hamas and by improving cooperation between the
US`s traditional allies in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE,
Jordan and Egypt, and limiting US influence on central Asia, the Caucasus and the
Middle East.[9]
Russia has
improved its economic position by selling weapons and by facilitating energy
cooperation in a way that surpassed US sales and Arab countries are eager to
buy. It has been warned in a US National Security Council project document that
by 2020 many of the Middle East countries will recognize Russia as a stabilizer
against US influence in the region. Russia will play an important role around
the world in the near future due to:
1. Abundant resources of oil and natural gas
2. Military research and weapons’ development
NATO expansion to the east
The 9/11 incident caused some changes in
different organizations like the North Atlantic Treaty Organization attitudes’
towards security problems. Within 24 hours after the attacks, NATO members
agreed upon signing a treaty about terrorism as a major threat to the expansion
of NATO missions. Although the subject of NATO expansion was on the political
agenda of NATO, using this incident as an opportunity, NATO in general and the US
in particular tried a a great deal to go through the military structures of
Russia, the separated complex of the Soviet Union, by expanding NATO and having
influence in the east.
So in this
matter, NATO must prove to Kremlin officials that activities in this region are
not against any third government and the development of security by NATO`s
program will help to increase Russia`s security too. Since the economical benefits
of cooperating with western organizations are so important for Russia, its defense
industry will be benefitted by cooperating with NATO too.[10]
In spite of
some disagreements, Russia is willing to have collaboration with NATO. By this
action, the major obstacles of attaining American values and goals are removed
and Russia is now, as a strategic partner with the US, so that NATO, the US and
Russia will be the three sides of a triangle in the international system.
US officials
care about American values and also in the past, they have mentioned it in major
contracts, like the Paris agreement which was concluded between NATO and Russia
in May 28, 1997; Henry Kissinger states that every action done by Russia and
NATO, or separately must be compatible with US goals.[11]
The effects of 9/11 on Russia in international system
Despite Russia`s ambition for power, this country has
benefitted from the post Cold War opportunities to increase its power. 9/11
opened up an opportunity for Russia to promote its international position.
Determining factors in promoting Russia`s position after 9/11 are as follows:
An equal policy of Russia
Since the middle of 1990, Vladimir Putin has formed a
foreign policy to have a general strategy and to make Russia a great power, and
this struggle has been augmented with the transmission of power to Dmitry
Medvedev, as is completely clear in Russian`s officials’ discussions. For
example, Putin described the fragmentation of Soviet Union as a total
geopolitical catastrophe in his annual speech to the federal assembly in 2005
and they have not abandoned the dream of returning to their former magnificence
yet[12].
Putin and his accompanying politicians acted in a manner that Russian`s equal
policy is called the policy gravitation towards West.
Despite the different groups inside Russia and different
points of view towards Russia`s performance in collaboration with the West,
Putin and his supporters gravitated towards the West to restore Russia and to
take up a better position. According to some of analysts, this collaboration
led to flexibility on the part of Vladimir Putin and the Westernizers, as seen
in the response to US strategic decisions like the entrance of the Baltic
countries into NATO in 2004, and the cancellation of the Anti-Ballistic Missile
Treaty in 2002[13].
Particular attention to domestic potentials and
organizing economic condition
With Vladimir Putin’s election and determining domestic
policy, economic organizing had priority above all. From Putin’s prime ministry
up to his presidency which lasted until 2008, the developments of domestic
projects were $103 trillion, more than six times the developments in 1999. Wage
growth grew from 65 dollars to 540[14].
Putin and his supporters wanted to have influence on the West. Russia`s
business lobby was not that powerful after the Cold
War, when it reappeared in the economic field. Western investors established a
good relationship with the Kremlin since billions of dollars was going to be
poured in West Europe and North America. At first Russia had to organize its
economic condition to take up a proper position in order to compete with other
powers.
Emphasis on multilateralism in the international
organizations framework
Considering the US role in foreign policy international
relations, Russia has increased its concentration on multilateralism in the international
system to have an advantageous position in security measures and it will start
its activities in the international system when international organizations
such as security council of the UN, the Group of 8, and other powers, not only
do not limit Russia`s power, but impose some limitations on the US as a great
power[15].
Russia`s membership in international organizations is to keep this position. For
instance, its collaboration with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is in
this course.
Russia makes use of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization
as a tool to control tribal, religious fights and to prevent them from getting
into Russia, and supports other countries’ membership, even as a supervisor
like Iran, and also to make a balance of power and to prove the international
system’s multi-polarity in its relations with West.[16]
Energy strategy
The
Federal Republic of Russia has the largest resources of oil and gas in the
world, and could increase its power against the European Union (EU) and the US.
As a result, Kremlin officials believe that the West is quite weak, because of
its pressing requirements for Russia`s resources of energy, and this energy has
become a powerful tool for Russia to control the EU and other regions in Middle
East, and Central Asian energy policies.
Russia’s energy strategy was planned in 2003 by Vladimir
Putin, as the center of Russian`s diplomacy and prevented Europe from varying
energy sources in European countries specially gas to stay as international
market of gas. The particular attention of Putin to energy and its effects on
Russia`s foreign policy is one of the most influential factors for him to take
a respectable position among other powers and so made the US in Obama`s
presidency to find a solution for the problems that were coming from the carelessness
of the Bush government towards Russian influence on the world energy market.
Russian`s desire to have influence on the world market
and the increase in the price of oil in July 2008, from 18 to 147 dollars per
barrel, represents the economic effects on politics. But Russia has some
difficulties with its old infrastructures in its oil industry that needs Western
investments to strengthen its position in energy. Based on western estimates,
Russia`s oil industry needs 60 million dollars for more than 10 years.[17]
Conclusion
Russia has always tried to revive its past magnificence
and power, and by Vladimir Putin’s election as the leader of this country, the
official motto is “powerful Russia”. To coin this motto, Russia maintains
relations with the great powers in the world, especially the US as the most
essential one. This decision became more important after 9/11 and Russia made
an agreement on the US attack on Afghanistan.
In fact, 9/11 led
to some political and security requirements for the US and created an
opportunity for Russia to make use of all the factors which had been handed
down from the Soviet Union and to regain its lost powers. Russia tries to reach
to this level in its policy making framework. The US has been confronted with
some facts after 9/11 about its relationship with Russia:[18]
1. Russia is neither a friend nor a foe to the US and
changes its position in different situations versus the US.
2. Contrary to many American politicians, Russia is still
an international power and it is not possible to prevent it from using its
power.
3. Russia wants to bring into existence an international
order consisting of a four-member group of Russia, the US, the EU and the UN.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Hassan
Mirfakhraeei for his constructive guidance in some processes of performing
the research.
[1]Mankoff, Jeffrey, Russian
Foreign policy, The Return of great politics.
(NewYork: Rowman Little field publisher, 2009) p.12.
[2]Mearsheimer, John, The Tragedy of Great power politics, (NewYork:
Norton,2009), p.3.
[3]Tang,
Shiping A Theory security Strategy for our Time Defensive Realism, (NewYork:
Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), p. 20.
[4]Mearsheimer, John, “Hans
Morgenthau and Iraq War: realism versus neoconservatism”, 2005 , available at:
www.opendemocracy.net.
[5]Kramer, David J,
“Resetting U.S.-Russian Relation: It Takes Two”, Washington Quarterly,2010,
January, p.61.
[6]Ibid.
[7]Clinton, Bill, “American Foreign Policy and Democratic Idea”, Orbis,1993,
37(4): 655
[8]Kurth,
Andrey, “Rethinking
Sovereignty: American Strategy in the Age of Terror”, Survival, 2002, 44(2): 129.
[9]Friedman,
George, “The Middle
East and RUSSIA New Cam”, 2006, available at:
[10]Kogan,
Eugence The state of the Russia Aviation Industry and Export opportunities,
(Camberley ,2006), Surry: Conflict Studies Research center, p.19.
[11]Schecter,
Jerrold.L, Russian Negotiating Behavior, (Washington DC: United States
Institute of PEACE, 2005), P.55.
[12]Putin,
Vladimir, “Annual Address
to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation”, 2005 available at: www.kremlin.ru.
[13]Mankoff,
Jeffery, “Russia and
the west: Taking the langerview”, Washington Quarterly, 2007, l30 (2): 127.
[14]Lucas, Edward,
The new cold war: Putins Russia and the threat to the west, (New
York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p87.
[15]Mankoff, Jeffery, 2009, op.cit, P.14.
[16]Stakelbeck, F.W, “The shanghai
cooperation organization, Front page magazine, available at: www.frontpagemag.com accessed 5/7/2008.
[17]Ibid, pp164-165.
[18]Rywkin, Michael,
“Russias place in world”, American Foreign policy, 2008, 30(5): 313.
*Razieh Hazrati - Law and International Relation Department, Alame Tabatabaei University, Tehran, IRAN
**Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaee - Law and International Relation Department, Alame Tabatabaei University, Tehran, IRAN
***Hamed Mahmoudi - Foreign Languages Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, IRAN, e-mail: Razieh.hazrati@gmail.com
© 2010, IJORS - INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RUSSIAN STUDIES